Twelve questions. Six minutes. See where your firm stands on AI governance.
MoiraCorp Academy · Free diagnostic
Twelve questions about how AI is used across your firm today. Six minutes. Three priority actions at the end, and a straight answer on whether you need a full governance framework or a lighter touch.
Built against the FCA’s principles-based approach to AI and the autonomy spectrum set out in the Mills Review of July 2026. Scored the same way for every firm, so the result is comparable rather than anecdotal.
You create a free account on the next screen — one tap with LinkedIn, or an email address. No payment details. You keep the results.
What you leave with
A readiness position across five areas, scored the same way for every firm, so you can see which one is weakest rather than guessing.
Most AI in an advice firm arrives without a procurement decision. The questions are written to surface the tools nobody logged.
Three priority actions in order, plus a straight answer on whether the full framework is worth your time or overkill.
What it covers
What is running in the firm today, who introduced it, and whether anyone owns it.
Where client information goes when a tool is used, and what the provider is permitted to do with it.
Who checks the output before it reaches a client, and how far along the autonomy spectrum each tool sits.
Whether you could show, after the fact, how a recommendation was reached and what the tool contributed.
What happens the day a tool gets something materially wrong, and who decides to switch it off.
Why now
of UK advice firms used AI in some form in 2026, up from 43% the year before.
intelliflo · survey of 209 firmssay the lack of a structured AI due diligence framework is what holds them back.
NextWealth · October 2025 · survey of 200 firms“The principles-based, outcomes focussed approach we’ve taken on AI — relying on the Consumer Duty and Senior Managers Regime — has been critical to us doing so.”
Ashley Alder · Chair of the FCA · 6 July 2026What it is built against
The Mills Review was published on 6 July 2026 and put seven recommendations to the FCA Board for consideration. It imposes no obligations by itself. What it gives firms is a way to describe how much decision-making a tool has been handed — and the further right a tool sits, the more oversight and evidence a supervisor will expect behind it.
Alignment describes how the material is written. It is not approval, endorsement or accreditation by any of these bodies.
No cost and no payment details. Your three priority actions appear on screen as soon as you finish.
The diagnostic tells you where the gaps are. The Regulator-Ready AI course walks your firm through closing them policy, registers and the evidence a supervisor would ask to see.
