Your analysts are spending 3 hours per application on work a scoring engine can do in 5 minutes.
“We’re receiving 500 applications a year. Our team physically cannot review them all properly.”
“Founders wait days for a response. The good ones move on before we get back to them.”
“We’re applying different criteria to different deals. There’s no consistency in how we score.”
Applications per year at the average VC fund. At 1–3 hours of manual review each, that is up to 1,500 analyst hours spent on intake — before a single investment decision is made.
Intake automated. Scoring implemented. Analysts focused on decisions — not data processing.
Web form deployed on your fund’s website. Startups submit key data and pitch decks directly. No email chains, no missing documents.
Applications automatically scored against your fund’s predefined criteria — team, market size, traction, stage. Consistent across every deal.
Screened applications surfaced ranked by score. Analyst time redirected to high-potential deals. Low-fit applications handled automatically.
Personalised response generated — Accepted to Due Diligence or Not a Fit. Sent within 24 hours of submission, every time.
From task report to resolution — tracked, routed, visible in real time
Automated investment screening for a venture capital fund — deployed in 4 weeks
We will show you exactly where automation will deliver immediate impact — and where it won’t.
