Login Readiness Review

Investment evaluation

Task status and reporting — Task status & reporting
The problem

One UK seed fund reports receiving around 6,000 decks a year — one every 88 minutes. Investors spend an average of two and a half minutes actually reading one. Triage is where the decisions really get made, and it is the least consistent part of the process.

Task status and reporting — — Head of Compliance
6,000 a year · 2m 30s each

Inbound volume at a single UK seed fund, against the average time an investor spends viewing a deck. Two founders with the same proposition can get different answers depending on who opened the file and when.

Sources: Fuel Ventures (30,000+ decks reviewed since 2014); DocSend Startup Index, viewing time tracked 2022–2024.

Task status and reporting — Weeks
What we do

The solution

Intake automated. Scoring implemented. Analysts focused on decisions — not data processing.

Task status and reporting — The solution
Application intake built

Web form deployed on your fund’s website. Startups submit key data and pitch decks directly. No email chains, no missing documents.

Task status and reporting — A live picture, not a manual pull
Scoring engine implemented

Applications automatically scored against your fund’s predefined criteria — team, market size, traction, stage. Consistent across every deal.

Task status and reporting — What to chase, and who to chase
Analyst workflow redesigned

Screened applications surfaced ranked by score. Analyst time redirected to high-potential deals. Low-fit applications handled automatically.

Task status and reporting — Average time-in-status, compared
Founder response automated

Personalised response generated — Accepted to Due Diligence or Not a Fit. Sent within 24 hours of submission, every time.

Task status and reporting — Defensible for compliance
How it works

How the workflow runs

From task report to resolution — tracked, routed, visible in real time

Task status and reporting — How the picture is built
Input
Task status and reporting — Input
Web application
Task status and reporting — Input
Pitch deck upload
Task status and reporting — Input
Startup key data
Task status and reporting — Input
Fund site direct
Task status and reporting — Owner & dates
Processing
Task status and reporting — Input
Data extraction
Task status and reporting — Input
Criteria scoring
Task status and reporting — Input
Market size check
Task status and reporting — Input
Stage validation
Task status and reporting — Flag outliers
Aproval
Task status and reporting — Input
Analyst review
Task status and reporting — Input
Accept / decline
Task status and reporting — Input
CRM updated
Task status and reporting — Where you’re slow
Output
Task status and reporting — Input
Founder response
Task status and reporting — Input
Pipeline recorded
Task status and reporting — Input
Reporting logged
Task status and reporting — Audit-ready report
Task status and reporting — Audit-ready report
Task status and reporting — Audit-ready report
Results

What changed

Automated investment screening for a venture capital fund

Same criteria
Every application scored against the fund’s own thesis, in the same way
Reason recorded
Each score carries the evidence behind it, for the investment committee
Every founder
gets a response, not silence
Task status and reporting — Input
Consistent scoring — every application judged on the same criteria
Task status and reporting — Input
Analyst time freed from intake and re-keying
Task status and reporting — Input
Every founder gets a reply, and a reason
Task status and reporting — Input
Scoring criteria can be changed without a rebuild
MoiraCorp Academy — Technical Library

Where is your team still processing manually?

We will show you exactly where automation will deliver immediate impact — and where it won’t.

Contact us